Mobile Money and More

m-Via Inc.

Pay By Touch, an idea whose time has passed

The payments industry is a fast-changing place, where the next great thing can quickly become obsolete. No one knows this better than Pay By Touch. In case you’ve missed the news (here and here), Pay By Touch’s founder, John Rogers, has filed for personal bankruptcy, while the company itself is fighting for its life against an involuntary bankruptcy petition.

Pay By Touch’s pay-with-your-finger approach was an interesting idea. But, let’s explore the reasons why it has failed. First and foremost, the company’s problem stems from the fact that its solution requires specialized hardware at every point-of-sale location. Compare this with Visa’s payWave and MasterCard’s PayPass initiatives. Even with the deep pockets that these organizations possess, convincing merchants to pay for new hardware to process payments under a new paradigm will take years before critical mass is reached.

Second, biometric payments have been bypassed with the emergence of mobile payments. Consumers don’t mind using a device to make purchases; they just won’t accept having “yet another” device that they have to carry around. But, with mobile payments, consumers simply use their mobile phones as the payment mechanism. And, according to recent surveys, people are more likely to forget their wallets than to leave the house without their cell phones. So, the mobile phone is already a must-have device.

Mobile technology also has some great advantages over POS biometrics:

  • Mobile payments can be conducted remotely.
  • Mobile payments technology can give you more than just payments. You can also do balance inquiries, check transaction histories, take advantage of mobile coupons and more.
  • Mobile payments work anywhere you are, anytime you want.

Pay By Touch failed because its solution was made obsolete before it gained critical mass. Pay By Touch failed by trying to build a new consumer brand (a strategy that wasted $300 million from investors). Pay By Touch failed because the value proposition wasn’t great enough to convince consumers to change their behavior.

November 15, 2007 - Posted by Ken | Mobile, Payments | , | 6 Comments

6 Comments »

  1. It failed because 1) the management was terrible and 2) there really was no benefit to consumers other than convenience (which was a stretch anyway). So you have a case where the merchants (who would benefit) were trying to force consumers to use something they didn’t want.

    Comment by Mike | November 15, 2007

  2. PBT is a great place to work with 08 looking to be their breakout year. This hurdle will soon fade away along with Rogers, payment adoption when combined with personalized marketing is a winning combo.

    Comment by longdigit | November 20, 2007

  3. It failed because it bought useless and troubled companies like CardSystems leaving it forced to pay huge salaries to a bunch of has been executives!

    Comment by PBTFE | November 20, 2007

  4. it failed because too much money got thrown at it.

    Comment by Alex | December 5, 2007

  5. I was searching for this kind of a blog for months now. Actually lost the hope of finding one, but here i am :) Thanks for the great articles! Looking forward for a little read after dinner :)

    Comment by dinosaur fact | December 18, 2007

  6. PBT may have failed. I hope the technology can succeed and successfully continue under a completely different management structure. I believe biometrics is the next wave (finger, hand or eye scans). Just like folks said Credit Cards and then Debt Cards would not replace good old paper money. Just wait out on this one…

    Comment by Louie Smith | December 26, 2007


Leave a comment